- Messages
- 10,767
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He needs to start wearing underpantsOh shit it landed under ants what does that mean?
it gives us an idea of what the mobsters roles are and what they do and do not have to play againstI don't understand how that gives us an idea of who the mobsters are?
because we need to know who the vigilante will target without them saying "I will target blank". if we agree, the mob doesn't know which of us pulled the trigger.We can't even agree who to put on trial. How are we going to agree who the Vigilante should kill?
Why do we all have to agree who the Vigilante should kill to prove there is a Vigilante?
So we all agree, for arguments sake, to sacrifice @Zell 17 . If zell dies, then there is a vigilante. If zell does not die, either no vigilante or zell is vigilante?it gives us an idea of what the mobsters roles are and what they do and do not have to play against
because we need to know who the vigilante will target without them saying "I will target blank". if we agree, the mob doesn't know which of us pulled the trigger.
How does it let us know which of the mobster roles we are dealing with? Wouldn't this also help the mob know who they are dealing with?it gives us an idea of what the mobsters roles are and what they do and do not have to play against
...why do we need to know who the vigilante will target? If the vigilante just picks a random target we have confirmed the vigilante exists and the mob doesn't know who it is.because we need to know who the vigilante will target without them saying "I will target blank". if we agree, the mob doesn't know which of us pulled the trigger.
Vote Update:
shortkut (3) - Ants, canadaguy, TD
Cole (1) - Kat
Zell (1) - shortkut
Benzine (1) - Jawneh
TD (1) - Local Hero
Or Zell is the Don.So we all agree, for arguments sake, to sacrifice @Zell 17 . If zell dies, then there is a vigilante. If zell does not die, either no vigilante or zell is vigilante?
We’re fuckedBut what if we don't even have a Vigilante?
I like the idea. There is a downside. If there’s no vigilante and the person we “target” is a townie, the mob can just kill them and mislead us into thinking there’s a vigilante. It’s low odds though, less than 10% so seems worth doing.we're not allowed to role claim, and we have no protectors.
so there's only one strategy I can think of to confirm what we need to know that I can think of short of role claiming, and even then, it's a huge risk.
we all agree sometimes in wolf you have to lynch townies. we can confirm who the vigilante is if people can agree on who to have the vigilante target the next night phase.
we risk Insta gibbing a townie, but we'd know we have a vigilante without them outing themselves.
also, at this juncture, if the vigilante used their power night 0 picking from a random list of numbers, *they are doing it wrong*.
bad cop is more likely, but wasting his one kill is also dumb.
equally as dumb yo wasting button pusher. especially becsuse that would confirm 3 or 4 mob types.
These odds are wrong the vigilante could be already dead and Cole/mafia knows it.I like the idea. There is a downside. If there’s no vigilante and the person we “target” is a townie, the mob can just kill them and mislead us into thinking there’s a vigilante. It’s low odds though, less than 10% so seems worth doing.
Cole and Shortkut are acting like we do every other wolf-style game. Do you see one of us talking with our hands or something?Cole and shortkut are both extremely suspicious.
Actually, neither of you are acting in a way I've seen before.Cole and Shortkut are acting like we do every other wolf-style game. Do you see one of us talking with our hands or something?
1. Random arguing with Cole? - less than usual, I’ll give you thatActually, neither of you are acting in a way I've seen before.
That's fine if I sound suspicious. I learned in the last game I played that my playstyle makes people suspicious of me.1. Random arguing with Cole? - less than usual, I’ll give you that
2. random shit talking? - same as before
3. Lots of gifs? - same as before
You’re starting to sound suspicious yourself
That's fine if I sound suspicious. I learned in the last game I played that my playstyle makes people suspicious of me.
The great part? Unless the mob kills me, there's a fun trial experience.
because we'd have a better information if they have a button pusher. which would be 3 out of 4 mob confirmed roles.How does it let us know which of the mobster roles we are dealing with? Wouldn't this also help the mob know who they are dealing with?
because if we don't have a vigilante, this hill to climb is going to suckthe. this game favors the mob heavily. we need known help that we can rely on....why do we need to know who the vigilante will target? If the vigilante just picks a random target we have confirmed the vigilante exists and the mob doesn't know who it is.
I'm assuming that the mob kill would be announced differently than the vigilante kill.I like the idea. There is a downside. If there’s no vigilante and the person we “target” is a townie, the mob can just kill them and mislead us into thinking there’s a vigilante. It’s low odds though, less than 10% so seems worth doing.
no but I was working on a Simpson's themed one.Anyone want to make a pretzel themed wolf game?
Vash said all kills will be announced identically even if no cleaner usedbecause we'd have a better information if they have a button pusher. which would be 3 out of 4 mob confirmed roles.
because if we don't have a vigilante, this hill to climb is going to suckthe. this game favors the mob heavily. we need known help that we can rely on.
I'm assuming that the mob kill would be announced differently than the vigilante kill.
if they clean it again, then they've lost another ability.
and if there's only one kill and not two, that would help narrow it down in the event of a cleaning.
Oh?I the vigilante
no. the bad cop can kill. there are 3 killers, two of which only have one use. and we have no idea what night 0 was.I don’t think we need to go through picking someone for the vigilante. If we ever see two kills again in one night, the vigilante exists right?
Vash said all kills will be announced identically even if no cleaner used
If they're announced identically then wouldn't it not reveal the how here? Just what roles the people had?I'm inclined to feel like night 0 was button man which is probably part of why they cleaned it.
Vigilante and Bad Cop both make no sense to actually kill on Night 0.
Oh I didn't mean they cared about the how, just that they didn't want us to know the IDs of two civilians.If they're announced identically then wouldn't it not reveal the how here? Just what roles the people had?
And the votes for a trial are very limited, we need 6 to put someone on trial.Also we're just about halfway through the first day phase I believe, though most of us don't have nearly 12 hours of activity left before we sleep.
I'll use this as a fallback option if nothing better comes up.And the votes for a trial are very limited, we need 6 to put someone on trial.
I'm just gonna put this out there.
If we really aren't gonna find someone to put on trial, just put me on trial. Like I said, a trial is better than abstain.
NONE of the 3 make sense to use at random night 0, that's the whole point.I'm inclined to feel like night 0 was button man which is probably part of why they cleaned it.
Vigilante and Bad Cop both make no sense to actually kill on Night 0.
I also don't really care if I'm on trial either.And the votes for a trial are very limited, we need 6 to put someone on trial.
I'm just gonna put this out there.
If we really aren't gonna find someone to put on trial, just put me on trial. Like I said, a trial is better than abstain.