Here's what I don't understand about this logic though:
I accused Local of being mafia and giving himself cover by targetting Zell, who I also claim is mafia
But by me claiming Zell is mafia and that Local is also mafia, that doesn't afford me the same sort of cover you afforded Local?
So basically, Local saying Zell is mafia and voting for Zell means he's not mafia.
But me saying Local and Zell (who has a strong tell revealed, with more evidence than others) are mafia, and voting for Zell means I am mafia?
It's not logical.
Maybe I haven't read far enough yet.