- Messages
- 8,625
He's not helping himself with this Israel/Palestine answer either....Yeah, I'm trying to forgive any stuttering, but none of this really makes sense...
"by the way", "anyway..."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's not helping himself with this Israel/Palestine answer either....Yeah, I'm trying to forgive any stuttering, but none of this really makes sense...
"by the way", "anyway..."
She's failed at national campaigns before to the point of dropping out before a single primary vote was cast. She's also unpopular among the left for her time as a DA (not a great track record).So I listened to Jon Stewart's podcast and one guy on there says it should be Harris, that she's a great communicator
What are her "skeletons"? I know republics like to claim she slept her way to the top which I am pretty sure is false
She's failed at national campaigns before to the point of dropping out before a single primary vote was cast. She's also unpopular among the left for her time as a DA (not a great track record).
But she's still a capable human.
“America: We have capable humans.”
Is that Vanilla Ice?
![]()
It was passable while he was reading off the teleprompters, so 7 minutes 50 seconds. Next 56 seconds were him reading a name off a list and the reporter asking their question. Then took 4 seconds before he referred to Trump as the VP.
That's a blisteringly fast pace to a fuck up.
For comparison, here is Joe's speech at the 2016 DNC:
2016 Interview with Stephen Colbert:
2020 Inauguration:
I also looked at 2012 and 2008, but there's diminishing returns in his speech pattern and confidence. He messes up words from time to time, but I think that's just how he speaks.
His stutter disability is real. But there is a palpable difference between that (of which I am completely forgiving of) and what we see now.I also looked at 2012 and 2008, but there's diminishing returns in his speech pattern and confidence. He messes up words from time to time, but I think that's just how he speaks.
This is true of absolutely every single president if you look at before and after.Thinking about it, Obama was fresh-faced when he got elected, then 8 years later he's greying and looks like he's seen some shit. That's gotta take a toll on you even just mentally... And Joe unfortunately doesn't have the youth to spare.
Legit thought you were talking about Gamewinners until "The White House" made me realize.Man, I was going to compare GW in 2000, to GW in 2008, but he had to stay at the White House because of a hurricane (job related stuff) so his speech was pre-recorded. TBH, GW didn't change much outside of looking slightly older. Once a dumbass, always a dumbass.
GameWinners is where our nations takes hope. Where wings take dream.Legit thought you were talking about Gamewinners until "The White House" made me realize.
Unless something drastic happens, he's more likely to lose than not.This circles back to my first post in this thread, because he's stubbornly refusing to drop out. So as much as I would love for him to be replaced by, well, almost ANYONE, as long as he keeps boisterously staying in the race, we might as well plan for November (and possibly what happens after, if he loses).
I don't know how cemented in he truly is as the nominee if he himself doesn't choose to step down, in like an official rules capacity. There has to be some mechanism by which the DNC can put someone else up regardless of time/money lost.This circles back to my first post in this thread, because he's stubbornly refusing to drop out. So as much as I would love for him to be replaced by, well, almost ANYONE, as long as he keeps boisterously staying in the race, we might as well plan for November (and possibly what happens after, if he loses).
Yeah they can, but it would be chaos and alienate people.I don't know how cemented in he truly is as the nominee if he himself doesn't choose to step down, in like an official rules capacity. There has to be some mechanism by which the DNC can put someone else up regardless of time/money lost
Strictly speaking, his delegates are not pledged. They can ultimately vote for whomever they please, a point Biden himself made at yesterday's conference.I don't know how cemented in he truly is as the nominee if he himself doesn't choose to step down, in like an official rules capacity. There has to be some mechanism by which the DNC can put someone else up regardless of time/money lost.
"Bye 'den, 4 President"Like maybe, as a silly example, a Whitmer campaign for Pres could remain legally entitled "Biden for President", and would just colloquially be referred to as the "Whitmer for President" campaign.
That wouldn't be possible given that Biden (and Harris) are explicitly listed on the campaign documents creating "Biden for President".After witnessing the legal fuckery Trump has engaged in over the past few years and skated free from, I'm sure there are some dumb legal loopholes or semantic justifications that Dems could use to ensure their hypothetical new candidate stays on the ballot and they're able to continue using the financing pledged to Biden.
Like maybe, as a silly example, a Whitmer campaign for Pres could remain legally entitled "Biden for President", and would just colloquially be referred to as the "Whitmer for President" campaign.
The president can now legally do whatever they want so long as they deem it an official act.That wouldn't be possible given that Biden (and Harris) are explicitly listed on the campaign documents creating "Biden for President".
Write an addendum! The law in the US only means what people in power BELIEVE it to meanThat wouldn't be possible given that Biden (and Harris) are explicitly listed on the campaign documents creating "Biden for President".
Who's doing what with the what now?
(Head in the sand, not engaging)
But after that presser, the only thing he seemed passionate about was foreign policy... and never-Trumpers and independents do not give a shit about that. He spent no time assuaging the fears of the DOMESTIC issues. And when he's asked about domestic issues, the stuttering and mindless wandering of thoughts are in overdrive. He ONLY seems calm and able to answer foreign policy. And yes, I get he was at NATO, but the foreign countries are NOT the ones voting in our election. And Biden seemed lost in every question NOT related to foreign policy.
I mean you could have stopped hereThis should be absolutely a surprise to no one that Trump was lying
Because they are just as hateful and spiteful as himI don't think more than 2% of the shit he says is truthful.
Which is why I don't understand the lemmings following his cult.
See, that's where I struggle, because I don't necessarily think that's true overall.Because they are just as hateful and spiteful as him
You're probably right, it's like they burry their heads in the sand to "own the libs" it's very cult likeSee, that's where I struggle, because I don't necessarily think that's true overall.
A small handful of people? Sure. But MILLIONS of people? I know plenty of Trump supporters that AREN'T hateful. So where does support for him come from? This blind loyalty?
I think AS A PEOPLE humans tend to come together in crisis. I grew up in MA. I saw how people came together after the Marathon Bombings. I saw the unity after 9/11. I saw how people came together after Hurricane Katrina...
I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying I don't understand how SO many people blindly support a narcissistic, sociopathic, pathological liar who has LITERALLY said he wants to destroy democracy. And watching the SCOTUS now saying he can do it with impunity....