which thought process is "repeatedly tell everyone I'm innocent"?Im laying out my thought process.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
which thought process is "repeatedly tell everyone I'm innocent"?Im laying out my thought process.
which thought process is "repeatedly tell everyone I'm innocent"?
is THAT what I did?Telling everyone that you are mafia seems have have somehow removed you from suspicion so maybe I should sit and learn.
Protecting Cole or zell?For the record I would like to see Cole on trial next
Not protecting anyone
why would you like to see that, old friend?For the record I would like to see Cole on trial next
With joyis THAT what I did?
please, show, and be specific.
I think I figured out your problem.With joy
Post in thread 'VTS Mafia Night 1/Day 1'
https://gwforums.com/threads/vts-mafia-night-1-day-1.628/post-29956
With joy
Post in thread 'VTS Mafia Night 1/Day 1'
https://gwforums.com/threads/vts-mafia-night-1-day-1.628/post-29956
I think we will learn more with you in the hot seat than him.why would you like to see that, old friend?
I made a joke about wanting to kill you even if you were a citizen but that was SERIOUS BUSINESS.I think I figured out your problem.
lying by repeatedly saying "I AM A MEMBER OF THE TOWN EVERYONE SHOULD LISTEN TO ME AND WHAT I SAY"
subtle.
a sarcastic joke clearly not playing your game.
the actual truth.
got it.
I really don't think you'll learn anything I haven't told you.I think we will learn more with you in the hot seat than him.
that wasnt a joke, you already admitted that was "anger".I made a joke about wanting to kill you even if you were a citizen but that was SERIOUS BUSINESS.
You'd be surprisedI really don't think you'll learn anything I haven't told you.
as the one who would have the information to give, I can promise you, I won't be.You'd be surprised
Yeah being annoyed doesn’t remove one’s ability to make a joke.that wasnt a joke, you already admitted that was "anger".
so now you're doubling back on *THAT*.
the way you defended Kat?What’s more interesting to me is not Cole being Coleman, but why shortkut is so vigorously supporting him.
Kut, you think Cole is town that strongly or what
I mean in this case it does.Yeah being annoyed doesn’t remove one’s ability to make a joke.
I wanted you on trial day 1. If anything Cole is supporting meWhat’s more interesting to me is not Cole being Coleman, but why shortkut is so vigorously supporting him.
Kut, you think Cole is town that strongly or what
Never said the information would come from youas the one who would have the information to give, I can promise you, I won't be.
@TD - trial question: what are your thoughts on zell?
This is logical! Kat dying is really the best point of INNOCENCE for Cole TBH.
One juror asking what I think of another juror.
I graded out my suspicion rankings (scored out of 10, 10 being extremely suspicious). Full rankings will be shared soon. I'll add, nothing more than intuition.
I have Zell among the highest at 7/10 right now. But he could easily swing to the other side, he's either really guilty or just looks really guilty.
- The argument with Cole, the way he defended the strategy that the mafia used so openly and aggressively to the point of voting Cole was strange. However, I feel like that's almost too obvious? I can't ignore it though.
- Publically saying he's fine with the Vigilante killing him, which at the time seemed like innocence but when I thought about it (and after seeing no Vigilante kill), I feel like there's at least a possibility that Tommy or Smacktard were the Vigilante and he felt comfortably saying that to "prove innocence" but knew it wouldn't happen.
- The way he jumped on Cole immediately today with Kat dying absolutely reeked of a frame job.
Is this grounds for a mistrial?
Thank you for your thoughts. I am leaning towards a bit guilty verdict, you seem to be on the level
One juror asking what I think of another juror.
I graded out my suspicion rankings (scored out of 10, 10 being extremely suspicious). Full rankings will be shared soon. I'll add, nothing more than intuition.
I have Zell among the highest at 7/10 right now. But he could easily swing to the other side, he's either really guilty or just looks really guilty.
- The argument with Cole, the way he defended the strategy that the mafia used so openly and aggressively to the point of voting Cole was strange. However, I feel like that's almost too obvious? I can't ignore it though.
- Publically saying he's fine with the Vigilante killing him, which at the time seemed like innocence but when I thought about it (and after seeing no Vigilante kill), I feel like there's at least a possibility that Tommy or Smacktard were the Vigilante and he felt comfortably saying that to "prove innocence" but knew it wouldn't happen.
- The way he jumped on Cole immediately today with Kat dying absolutely reeked of a frame job.
"a bit" guilty?Thank you for your thoughts. I am leaning towards a bit guilty verdict, you seem to be on the level
View attachment 2243
Also this is a really good point about the Vigilante. I think it’s very likely they are dead or not in the game. But frankly I wanted to be shot because I’m useless, it would prove the vigilante, and I wasn’t having fun arguing with Cole about the dumbest shit imaginable. Still am not.
One juror asking what I think of another juror.
I graded out my suspicion rankings (scored out of 10, 10 being extremely suspicious). Full rankings will be shared soon. I'll add, nothing more than intuition.
I have Zell among the highest at 7/10 right now. But he could easily swing to the other side, he's either really guilty or just looks really guilty.
- The argument with Cole, the way he defended the strategy that the mafia used so openly and aggressively to the point of voting Cole was strange. However, I feel like that's almost too obvious? I can't ignore it though.
- Publically saying he's fine with the Vigilante killing him, which at the time seemed like innocence but when I thought about it (and after seeing no Vigilante kill), I feel like there's at least a possibility that Tommy or Smacktard were the Vigilante and he felt comfortably saying that to "prove innocence" but knew it wouldn't happen.
- The way he jumped on Cole immediately today with Kat dying absolutely reeked of a frame job.
ooo valid.Never said the information would come from you
FRAME JOB. STEP 2.This is logical! Kat dying is really the best point of INNOCENCE for Cole TBH.
But the whole thread yesterday Cole talked about how everyone’s reads were bad while saying Kat was the most suspicious for simply asking him to defend his illogic. But he’s not gonna see that and say “hey, maybe I should revisit my assumptions” it’s gonna be full speed ahead until another citizen is dead. Probably me.
Not guilty but can’t edit or I’d be guilty of a capital offense"a bit" guilty?
Yeah I think it should be pretty obvious that I would never play it like that. But if I was , I’d also say “Look Kat thought Cole was suspicious and she’s dead!”ooo valid.
FRAME JOB. STEP 2.
let's lay it out.
Cole says "Kat is suspicious"
Zell says "Kat is not suspicious!"
*KAT DIES*
Clearly the work of criminal mastermind Cole who would DEFINITELY lay out the one person he had named as most suspicious.
does this level of play usually work for you?
The more @Crazy Jamie the betterObviously a different legal system, but I think we need @Crazy Jamie to confirm if we are doing law properly here
"a bit" guilty?
alright I understand.Yeah I think it should be pretty obvious that I would never play it like that. But if I was , I’d also say “Look Kat thought Cole was suspicious and she’s dead!”
Im putting you on stand so that we can hear your role claim and what info you know. That’s the primary reason already stated. The fact that you might be evil is a secondary bonus.alright I understand.
you don't think I'm stupid enough to kill the person I was suspicious of.
you think I'm even stupider and would kill someone that was suspicious of me.
...guess I know what you think of my skill. I just hope enough people agree with you that I would do something that stupid.
but you keep on with your base level frame job. let me know how it works out.
for one, please spare me the "Cole isnt dead he must be one of them" conversations. Its the oldest setup in the book. ALSO FUN FACT: shortkut routinely says he likes to keep me Alive in these games when he's an evil to make it more of a challenge. The last game he was evil and I was town, I was seer checked and they didnt want the role in the game, so they killed me. maybe this is him trying to let me stay Alive, especially in a game where the mafia has the Advantage, maybe he's sporting enough to let me try.
And what type of work is it you do?
yeah, you can certainly try. the best part is how you'll look after.Im putting you on stand so that we can hear your role claim and what info you know. That’s the primary reason already stated. The fact that you might be evil is a secondary bonus.