- Messages
- 6,083
I said that accidentally.![]()
I am going to start voting for people who say “on accident” instead of “by accident”
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Everyone stop what you're doing! It's happening! GW's own Alu is having a baby!! Come and congratulate him here: Need some help identifying this picture.
We're so happy for you, Alu!I said that accidentally.![]()
I am going to start voting for people who say “on accident” instead of “by accident”
So you can have a nice priority list of townie to kill I presume?So we should almost definitely let Quagmire shoot tonight. It proves him, dimmerwit, probably Ben and also whoever is marked.
FR and Jon good by Ants.
I’d like to hear from: Local, shortkut, Alu, canadaguy, Christina, Jawneh, Kat, Tommy
What was Ben's information?I've never been shy about day 1 voting, so I'm okay with acting on Ben's information for the time being.
What was Ben's information?
Then I will switch to JawnehI said that accidentally.
I checked. Dimmerwit and quagmire are different teams… but I didn’t see how dimmerwit was exoneratedWhat was Ben's information?
I'm good with a 50 50. Unless they're both innocent and Ben's guilty.I checked. Dimmerwit and quagmire are different teams… but I didn’t see how dimmerwit was exonerated
Ah so because Ants already can't deal with accidentally clearing Jon and FR he had to change "shortkut's information" to "Ben's information" for it to be palatable.I checked. Dimmerwit and quagmire are different teams… but I didn’t see how dimmerwit was exonerated
This statement made my head hurt.Ah so because Ants already can't deal with accidentally clearing Jon and FR he had to change "shortkut's information" to "Ben's information" for it to be palatable.
I didn’t provide any information because it was impossible for my role to provide information last nightAh so because Ants already can't deal with accidentally clearing Jon and FR he had to change "shortkut's information" to "Ben's information" for it to be palatable.
I can see that.
Ah. So when you said "I checked" you mean you checked Ben's information and not that you were the one who made the initial check.I didn’t provide any information because it was impossible for my role to provide information last night
I don't think he was, just that he claimed a role and I don't think quagmire did yet? Dimmerwit claimes flagger.I checked. Dimmerwit and quagmire are different teams… but I didn’t see how dimmerwit was exonerated
No reason I can think of to lie. We should kill Fools to check just encase though. I hear he is out hunting heads.Okay yeah. Today was a busy day with looking at too many strollers so I missed Ben's blatant statement about the two of them being on different teams. If Christina isn't lying (for some reason), that means one of of them would be some sort of murdering murder man.
Or that Ben is lying.
I may be a dick, but no lying this game.Or that Ben is lying.
Oh flagger, the most innocent of rolesI don't think he was, just that he claimed a role and I don't think quagmire did yet? Dimmerwit claimes flagger.
im not opposed to this ideaNo reason I can think of to lie. We should kill Fools to check just encase though. I hear he is out hunting heads.
no cap?I may be a dick, but no lying this game.
Fr frno cap?
Omg I forgot that I can still vote jawneh. He hasn't been cleared by anyone yet!We good with testing out the claims and murderate Quagmire? Sure, it's better than my feelings based argument. I can't dispute that. Then again, blood for the blood god would also suffice?
Why in the fuck would you vote for the one person who claims a role that’s nearly instantly provableVoted quagmire for now
My guy, if I was a wolf I already know who the villagers are.So you can have a nice priority list of townie to kill I presume?
There’s no harm in letting him shoot whoever is marked. If he’s real and dies, we kill dimmerwit. Plus whoever he shoots is proven a villager. If he shoots a baddie, even better. If he doesn’t shoot, we kill him tomorrow. Kill someone else today. 0% Local is good hereI missed where Quagmire claimed marksman, had to go back and look for it after Zells post.
So between Ben, Quagmire, and Dimmerwit, it's not possible for all three of them to be telling the truth.
I vote for you out of loveI'm wondering about Ben now as he shadowed slapped a vote on me. canadaguy just lol votes me despite slowly hurting my feelings every time. kut I don't know about, but the Ben vote is weird. At best I could think of making another juicy target beyond Quagmire? Why would he vote me and not either Quagmire or dimmer if he's town?
I don't know what to feel about this.
Because of shortkut's post below. It was the only post with "info" I've seen.Why in the fuck would you vote for the one person who claims a role that’s nearly instantly provable
I checked. Dimmerwit and quagmire are different teams… but I didn’t see how dimmerwit was exonerated
Fairvoting local for extremely dumb vote
Incorrectand even worse claim
Incorrect0% Local is good here
Sooo, kill Local today?There’s no harm in letting him shoot whoever is marked. If he’s real and dies, we kill dimmerwit. Plus whoever he shoots is proven a villager. If he shoots a baddie, even better. If he doesn’t shoot, we kill him tomorrow. Kill someone else today. 0% Local is good here
Yeah I can't think of any reason either somebody would lie in this game!No reason I can think of to lie.
Please don't.Sooo, kill Local today?
This makes more sense than lynching meHmm, should we be suspicious that Zell is pushing us away from lynching one of the people Ben has claimed one of isn't town?
I'm not that suspicious of Zell pointing out Quagmire should be able to prove himself, that's true.Hmm, should we be suspicious that Zell is pushing us away from lynching one of the people Ben has claimed one of isn't town?
It's not a waste, it still clears him or another townie, plus it clears you if we know he's good and dimmerwit isn't, which we wouldn't know tomorrow if we let dimmerwit live.I would vote for dimmerwit instead so Quagmire doesn't have to waste a shot at all, but that just ruins the potential waterfall of information that forcing Quagmire to shoot provides. Plus if dimmerwit is legit flagger, we'll likely need all the protection roles we can get.
It’s POSSIBLE that Ben is faking, but that’s another reason to basically ignore the dimmerwit != Quagmire info for today at least.What if we kill dimmerwit today, and if he's good and quagmire proves himself tomorrow, we kill Ben?
Are we believing Christina that Ben can't be headhunter and neither quagmire or dimmerwit is the fool?
I voted for you on accidentI'm wondering about Ben now as he shadowed slapped a vote on me. canadaguy just lol votes me despite slowly hurting my feelings every time. kut I don't know about, but the Ben vote is weird. At best I could think of making another juicy target beyond Quagmire? Why would he vote me and not either Quagmire or dimmer if he's town?
I don't know what to feel about this.
So ignore his info and kill at random/on vibes? Or kill nobody when we have this claim? Why?It’s POSSIBLE that Ben is faking, but that’s another reason to basically ignore the dimmerwit != Quagmire info for today at least.
... Or if we find that quagmire and dimmerwit are on the same team... Another person countering his claim could also be lying so it still doesn't prove anything.The only way we’d discover Ben was lying is if the other two strong villagers come out and tell us he is fake. The Strong villagers may have good reason to not claim on day 1. That will not be true tomorrow.
I voted for you on accident