- Messages
- 3,878
That's not necessarily the choice though. The people making models and textures aren't necessarily the same people who implement guns, or indeed other features. I actually don't think the shots look that much different - the texture detail is quite similar but is washed out by the lighting in the lower shot. The model is better but since models are often done at higher detail and culled down to run on actual hardware I'm not sure there's much difference there either.![]()
In terms of variety, yeah, you're not wrong, but, I just think that there should have been more for the wait. For example, I saw this the other day...
View attachment 30864
Big difference, sure, but, is it necessary? Or could that effort been applied elsewhere in the game? Don't get me wrong, I truly appreciate the attention to detail and the visual improvements over time, but, I'd rather see the effort elsewhere. If I had to choose between a rat that has fur with visible strands and visually discernible rings on the tail or another weapon or vehicle, I'll take the latter. Same goes for open, empty roads... Give us a few more building interiors instead of creating a highway to nowhere important.
Visual progress is not always labour intensive anyway. The reason an increasing number of AAA games are switching to mandatory ray tracing is because it's much easier to implement for the developers. GTA VI has RTGI and I'm not convinced there'll be a fallback.
As for interiors, I agree I'd like more, but I'll say that I'd hate for them to lose scale. The map doesn't need to be massive but I'd like it to be bigger than V, which it is. I do think it's needed to represent different areas authentically.
I think it's also the 5 and a half year gap between them. That said, I've always preferred V in pretty much every way.I genuinely think this is nostalgia goggles. I played IV and V for the first time this year, back-to-back. The differences were like night and day, but in V's favor. Most people generally agree that IV has a better story (I'm not among them), but V objectively has much more variety and depth in content and complexity.