And we always have Alu to string up next
This sentiment is truthfully why we'll lose, if anything.
Anyone that speaks is suspicious. Disagreeing with anything someone says makes you both suspicious. The only way to not be suspicious is to not talk and let the wolves do as they please.
"If TD is innocent, we'll kill Alu" - "If TD is guilty, we'll kill Warp" - "If they're all X we'll kill Y"
The context doesn't matter in those scenarios, it's all reactionary play until/unless it's spelled out that someone has a specific role and can play leader with no doubts remaining. I don't know if TD is guilty or not. I don't know if Alu is, either. But if I have a strong feeling one way or the other, I can - and will - articulate just why that is. If that increases or decreases my suspicions,
good. That's the point. And that works both ways - the more you insist someone is +/-, the more +/- we can gauge in kind.
In Zell's last game the wolves were all better townies than the
actual townies, and the town won not (just) because of a job well done but because the rules happened to favor them and they got lucky on the mass murder spread. It's still early in the game, but I don't see a lot of difference between FQ#1, Zell#3 and what's happening here so far.
Also, the usual disclaimer: The more easily a bandwagon forms, the more likely it is that you're wrong.