FQ Wolf FQ Wolf Vol. 2 - Night 0 & Day 1

[Tubby23]

Blue bird pew pew

So you're the Elon Musk of this game? That almost enough to change my vote

 

[Local Hero]

So you're the Elon Musk of this game? That almost enough to change my vote

You disgust me

 

[Smacktard]

Welp, since there's been few developments, time to shake things up. Ahem...

Hark! Fellow townsmen and townswomen, something peculiar disturbs my thoughts. This Olga character, though skin as hairless as a baby's bottom, surely runs with the wolves! Do not be deceived by her fair skin, for once I witnessed her howling at the moon!

I entreat you: peer into my soul and know my judgment be not clouded by evil thoughts.

Voting for Olga

Whew. I'm going to take a seat. This whole levelling accusations thing is awful hard on the body. I feel a bit light-headed. Are there any meds I can get for this?

 

[canadaguy]

Don't worry I gave you the blue bird guy what does the pewpew.

Ahh because of how effectively I pewpewed Cole last game right?

We don't talk about the second shot.

 

[Kat]

Welp, since there's been few developments, time to shake things up. Ahem...

Hark! Fellow townsmen and townswomen, something peculiar disturbs my thoughts. This Olga character, though skin as hairless as a baby's bottom, surely runs with the wolves! Do not be deceived by her fair skin, for once I witnessed her howling at the moon!

I entreat you: peer into my soul and know my judgment be not clouded by evil thoughts.

Voting for Olga

Whew. I'm going to take a seat. This whole levelling accusations thing is awful hard on the body. I feel a bit light-headed. Are there any meds I can get for this?

Aww I don't want to lynch Olga.

Still... I want to lynch somebody, so good enough for me. If she's not actually a wolf, then you're next!

Voting Olga

*Passes Smacktard some tequila*

... What, I'm not a doc-- err healer person who knows medicine.

 

[shortkut]

@Fire Queen vote count please

If my count is correct, @Ants! and @Olga lead with 2 votes each. That’s 2/3 of the players whose names start with a vowel… are we bigoted against voweled names? If we’re not, then I guess @ABCDEFGHIJKLMN0PQRSTUVWXYZ is next on the chopping block

 

[Jawneh]

There's also two people in the game whose names start with an A, two that start with an S, and a whooping three that start with a T. All those letters combined makes a poor new name for Alu.

 

[canadaguy]

There's also two people in the game whose names start with an A, two that start with an S, and a whooping three that start with a T. All those letters combined makes a poor new name for Alu.

But there are none that start with N. Curious. @Ants! what do you have to say about this?

 

[Tubby23]

There's also two people in the game whose names start with an A, two that start with an S, and a whooping three that start with a T. All those letters combined makes a poor new name for Alu.

AssTatt

 

[Benzine]

Why you flattering people

I am a very complimentary person and I love seeing success

 

[Olga]

Wait we’re actually doing this?! Fine!

Me too

Voting Local Hero for jumping on the polycule appreciation bandwagon. Sneaky thing to do.

(Honestly I’d recommend not lynching me just yet, I could be useful eventually, IF I’M NOT KILLED.)

 

[Tubby23]

Wait we’re actually doing this?! Fine!


Voting Local Hero for jumping on the polycule appreciation bandwagon. Sneaky thing to do.

(Honestly I’d recommend not lynching me just yet, I could be useful eventually, IF I’M NOT KILLED.)

Very sneaky

@Benzine flattery will only get you so far

 

[Smacktard]

Honestly I’d recommend not lynching me just yet, I could be useful eventually, IF I’M NOT KILLED.)

So you were implying you're polycule, now you're implying you're tycoon/alchemist?

 

[Olga]

So you were implying you're polycule, now you're implying you're tycoon/alchemist?

I wasn’t implying I was in the polycule! I just find Wolf so freakishly confusing as a game that I was happy to see roles that were so cute.

 

[Smacktard]

should anyone claim to have scars, i will post to verify whether they are authentic.

FQ, scar-check pls :

I have a crescent moon shaped scar on my forehead.

Between that and the glasses and the brown bowl cut hair growing up, I really wanted to sue Rowling for the slight switch to a lightning bolt.

 

[Ants!]

But there are none that start with N. Curious. @Ants! what do you have to say about this?

So vote NextBigThing

 

[Zell 17]

Welp, since there's been few developments, time to shake things up. Ahem...

Hark! Fellow townsmen and townswomen, something peculiar disturbs my thoughts. This Olga character, though skin as hairless as a baby's bottom, surely runs with the wolves! Do not be deceived by her fair skin, for once I witnessed her howling at the moon!

I entreat you: peer into my soul and know my judgment be not clouded by evil thoughts.

Voting for Olga

Whew. I'm going to take a seat. This whole levelling accusations thing is awful hard on the body. I feel a bit light-headed. Are there any meds I can get for this?

I am intrigued. I will tentatively vote for Olga

 

[VashTheStampede]

Ugh I don't wanna vote for Olga for meta reasons. It's her first game and the first day.

Also there's the obvious thing where she is claiming to be possibly helpful.

For those reasons I'm gonna put my vote on Ants at the moment.

 

[Ants!]

So two Day 1 banwagons are forming without any real reason or argument?

 

[Ants!]

I think the wolves are pissed off that they targeted me last night and couldn’t kill me. I can’t explicitly role claim though, so if I am Lynched today, take a look at what my role was and be immediately suspicious of the people who took me out.

 

[Tubby23]

It certainly seems that way, I can't really follow the logic for either so far.
Other than Vash's vote

 

[VashTheStampede]

So two Day 1 banwagons are forming without any real reason or argument?

Well I've become convinced by Zell from previous post-game breakdowns that it behooves us to at least TRY and hit a wolf day one.

Assuming my joke vote for Cole doesn't count as my vote switch, I'm completely open to bandwagoning someone else. Just gonna be hard for me to justify a quick kill on a newbie or someone who exited quickly in the previous game.

 

[Ants!]

Well I've become convinced by Zell from previous post-game breakdowns that it behooves us to at least TRY and hit a wolf day one.

Assuming my joke vote for Cole doesn't count as my vote switch, I'm completely open to bandwagoning someone else. Just gonna be hard for me to justify a quick kill on a newbie or someone who exited quickly in the previous game.

That’s fair I guess.

 

[Smacktard]

Ugh I don't wanna vote for Olga for meta reasons. It's her first game and the first day.

Also there's the obvious thing where she is claiming to be possibly helpful.

For those reasons I'm gonna put my vote on Ants at the moment.

I think the wolves are pissed off that they targeted me last night and couldn’t kill me. I can’t explicitly role claim though, so if I am Lynched today, take a look at what my role was and be immediately suspicious of the people who took me out.

I belieb it.

 

[TD]

I think the wolves are pissed off that they targeted me last night and couldn’t kill me. I can’t explicitly role claim though, so if I am Lynched today, take a look at what my role was and be immediately suspicious of the people who took me out.

So hypothetically - gun to your head, you're going to be lynched, who's suspicious to you?

 

[Raine]

So two Day 1 banwagons are forming without any real reason or argument?

I don't know, this is some pretty damning evidence.

Can I shoot ants on day one?

You can, but only after I vote for him.

And after he is given a chance to lie to my face, which I will absolutely believe, resulting in me voting for somebody else. ...You, probably.

I think the wolves are pissed off that they targeted me last night and couldn’t kill me. I can’t explicitly role claim though, so if I am Lynched today, take a look at what my role was and be immediately suspicious of the people who took me out.

Unless this is the lie...

I'm out the door in like 8 minutes. Chop-chop!

 

[Ants!]

So hypothetically - gun to your head, you're going to be lynched, who's suspicious to you?

Just saying that banwagons in general are suspicious, unless there is a very good reason for forming one. So if they are successful, then you will have a list of names.

 

[Ants!]

I don't know, this is some pretty damning evidence.




Unless this is the lie...

I'm out the door in like 8 minutes. Chop-chop!

WHAT is pretty damning evidence? Your interaction with shortkut? I don’t get it.

 

[Raine]

WHAT is pretty damning evidence? Your interaction with shortkut? I don’t get it.

You need more alcohol in your system.

If I frivolously change my vote then Olga's gonna have a bad time, so... someone else needs to do something stupid for a change!

 

[Ants!]

You need more alcohol in your system.

If I frivolously change my vote then Olga's gonna have a bad time, so... someone else needs to do something stupid for a change!

Or vote to abstain like I did. Like we did in FQ’s previous game on Day 1.

 

[Ants!]

You need more alcohol in your system.

Ordinarily I would agree, except that I am about to drive to work.

 

[TD]

Just saying that banwagons in general are suspicious, unless there is a very good reason for forming one. So if they are successful, then you will have a list of names.

While I see what you're saying, 2-3 votes (or whatever we are at) is not much of a bandwagon. It screams misguided townies to me. If we were at 6-8 votes I could see a wolf or two being involved. I think our wolves aren't jumping on the current bandwagon, yet.

 

[Olga]

Just saying that banwagons in general are suspicious, unless there is a very good reason for forming one. So if they are successful, then you will have a list of names.

Tbh this is really the only data point that is of any use at this moment: what bandwagons form, and by whom. If I get lynched, there’s at least utility in marking the people who vote for me. And putting fun aside, there’s so little reason for me to be voted on that I think it is the definition of a bandwagon.

 

[shortkut]

I wouldn’t be opposed to lynching @Zell 17 instead of ants or Olga. I was sure he was a wolf while he was hosting his games

 

[TD]

My biggest tangible observation:

Olga loves the polycule.
Local Hero and shortkut both agreed.
Smacktard votes Olga for claiming polycule.
Olga states they were not claiming polycule.

This leads me to believe Smacktard is a polycule and Olga is not. This makes me rather curious of Hero and kut who jumped on it, but had no effort to disprove it - like Smacktard just jumped on.

 

[Smacktard]

Tbh this is really the only data point that is of any use at this moment: what bandwagons form, and by whom. If I get lynched, there’s at least utility in marking the people who vote for me. And putting fun aside, there’s so little reason for me to be voted on that I think it is the definition of a bandwagon.

TBH, there's little evidence in favor of voting anyone at this point, but we have to go off of something.

Seeing people spring to your defense while no one sprang to Ants' defense, especially after implying he was the sleepwalker (and thus has to be killed during the day phase) was pretty interesting though

 

[Olga]

TBH, there's little evidence in favor of voting anyone at this point, but we have to go off of something.

Seeing people spring to your defense while no one sprang to Ants' defense, especially after implying he was the sleepwalker (and thus has to be killed during the day phase) was pretty interesting though

Tbf this is my first game and I am as confused as I have been watching the others. D:

 

[VashTheStampede]

Seeing people spring to your defense while no one sprang to Ants' defense, especially after implying he was the sleepwalker (and thus has to be killed during the day phase) was pretty interesting though.

TBF I totally missed that implication

 

[TD]

Tbf this is my first game and I am as confused as I have been watching the others. D:

 

[Olga]

What I’m not sure about is what Kelly is! He seemed to refer to having visions, but… well, I mean I know my status, and that means his “vision” is untrue! So… hmm @ Kelly

 

[Smacktard]

What I’m not sure about is what Kelly is! He seemed to refer to having visions, but… well, I mean I know my status, and that means his “vision” is untrue! So… hmm @ Kelly

You seem to be a real jack of all trades

 

[TD]

Something to keep in mind for our quiet seer.

9 people will appear as normal townie.
One of them is dangerous.
It'd be very bold for the dangerous one to try to claim polycule.

 

[Ants!]

TBF I totally missed that implication

You screamed subtlety was dead last game, maybe I was too subtle this time?

 

[Smacktard]

Something to keep in mind for our quiet seer.

9 people will appear as normal townie.
One of them is dangerous.
It'd be very bold for the dangerous one to try to claim polycule.

It'd also be the most logical of the wolves to claim to be poly. Imagine the fallout if it appears a townie was executed after all this.

The logic was that I could accuse one of the poly members of being a wolf and see if anyone came to their defense. As local and shortlist didn't (tho they implied they were poly too), we can assume that either Olga was lying or kut/local were lying.

...or this is a huge case of mistaken identity

 

[VashTheStampede]

You screamed subtlety was dead last game, maybe I was too subtle this time?

Oh I'm sure it's my fault for only half paying attention while on vacation

 

[shortkut]

My biggest tangible observation:

Olga loves the polycule.
Local Hero and shortkut both agreed.
Smacktard votes Olga for claiming polycule.
Olga states they were not claiming polycule.

This leads me to believe Smacktard is a polycule and Olga is not. This makes me rather curious of Hero and kut who jumped on it, but had no effort to disprove it - like Smacktard just jumped on.

Nothing is official if it’s not in table form.

Off the record, I was vocal about getting a role like this included in @Zell 17 ’s game, usually called masons. He should be able to confirm that my love for that role is independent of this game. You may now return to your regularly scheduled over-analysis of this game.

 

[TD]

It'd also be the most logical of the wolves to claim to be poly. Imagine the fallout if it appears a townie was executed after all this.

The logic was that I could accuse one of the poly members of being a wolf and see if anyone came to their defense. As local and shortlist didn't (tho they implied they were poly too), we can assume that either Olga was lying or kut/local were lying.

...or this is a huge case of mistaken identity

I don't think it would be logical at all for the wolves to claim poly as the 4 that are will easily be able to out the liar.

Based on kut's response, he seems to state he too was stating his love for poly/mason and not persay.. role claiming.

 

[TD]

We also have roughly a 20% chance of a dead "regular townie" being revealed as a wolf after a full phase. So even if we can kill one, we can't assume we were wrong. Poly will show poly on death.

 

[Smacktard]

I don't think it would be logical at all for the wolves to claim poly as the 4 that are will easily be able to out the liar.

But then it would be the word of 4 against 4, right? Admittedly, that strategy would likely crumble pretty quickly.

But what if there was some incentive for a particular type of wolf to be lynched day one?

 

[shortkut]

Random lynch or abstain?

@Fire Queen how much time left in day phase?