- Messages
- 16,773
Correct.I take it that it's not over. I just watch you guys reacting to the game.
3 town, 2 mafia, and bomber.
Zell just claimed bomber and is trying to get them to vote off Tubby.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Everyone stop what you're doing! It's happening! GW's own Alu is having a baby!! Come and congratulate him here: Need some help identifying this picture.
We're so happy for you, Alu!Correct.I take it that it's not over. I just watch you guys reacting to the game.
I mean, I could tell him why, but why would he think it's a good idea @Tubby23Why would Tubby want to kill himself
Exactly accurateSo how accurate was I with my last player list?
Honestly, it was more Tubby that connived me into suicide because at the point that it was him removed from the jury I felt I had lost canadaguy's support. So, I figured outing myself was the only way forward for them to go after Tubby.
I'm glad to see TD had me pegged from day one. I caught the really fucking shit end of the stick with that con.
I agree with it.So how accurate was I with my last player list?
So how accurate was I with my last player list?
So how accurate was I with my last player list?
Kind of a weak response though.TUBBY OVER 30.
![]()
Yes but the point is he broke the seal so he can elaborate.Kind of a weak response though.
We commented on that soooo many times. Fool claims peeping tom, sure, why not. Tubby claims patsy, sure, why not. You hint at being conned the entire game, and nobody believes it.Why was it so hard to convince kut and canadaguy I was innocent? Was having a con man that unbelievable?
I mean I only talked about it daily in a way that was just short of screaming "YOU GUYS! THIS OBVIOUS TELL I HAVE IS ANNOYING AF! I WAS CONNED SO THERE IS A CON MAN IN THIS GAME!"
I mean, I thought I was obviously innocent, but Alu killed me.Why was it so hard to convince kut and canadaguy I was innocent? Was having a con man that unbelievable?
I mean I only talked about it daily in a way that was just short of screaming "YOU GUYS! THIS OBVIOUS TELL I HAVE IS ANNOYING AF! I WAS CONNED SO THERE IS A CON MAN IN THIS GAME!"
With Vash's explanation of roles, I was under the impression the con man could con more than one person and I had NO IDEA they could choose to not kill. Zell really should have let me live if he wanted a shot at the bomber. I assume he killed me because then it would have put doubt on me instead of Tubby.
The dead thread was screaming at them too.Why was it so hard to convince kut and canadaguy I was innocent? Was having a con man that unbelievable?
I mean I only talked about it daily in a way that was just short of screaming "YOU GUYS! THIS OBVIOUS TELL I HAVE IS ANNOYING AF! I WAS CONNED SO THERE IS A CON MAN IN THIS GAME!"
I was looking for role hints/claims. My strategy was everyone who was innocent would hint, and a few who were guilty would hint. Once we had too many innocent roll claims then we can narrow it down. But we never even got to the minimum threshold so I was inclined to believe anyone who hinted at a role.We commented on that soooo many times. Fool claims peeping tom, sure, why not. Tubby claims patsy, sure, why not. You hint at being conned the entire game, and nobody believes it.
What do you mean on bed? And maybe it's because it was my first one of these games, but I played it as "I can hint about my role subtly uness I'm on trial and then go balls out." So I did hint pretty hard.I thought you were guilty because you didn't come out and say you were on bed ahead of time or try any role claim (whilst I was alive)
I'm selfishly so happy that people are saying this.I mean, I thought I was obviously innocent, but Alu killed me.
I thought you were guilty because you didn't come out and say you were on bed ahead of time or try any role claim (whilst I was alive)
For what it's worth, after reading your deductive reasonings in this thread (painful when you start at 22 pages to sift through mind you), I will be giving you the benefit of the doubt moving forward.Even when I feel like I'm blatantly trying to help I'm in an everlasting state of sus.
I'm sure there will beFor what it's worth, after reading your deductive reasonings in this thread (painful when you start at 22 pages to sift through mind you), I will be giving you the benefit of the doubt moving forward.
That said, let fucking go because I want in on another one of these!!!!! Like now!
Not everyone who is innocent will hint at a role. Imo it's not helpful to the town to hint at a role you can't prove or use to be helpful. It made sense to do what you did with your role, but I get why Jon never strongly hinted.My strategy was everyone who was innocent would hint
Typo. I don't even know. I'll look again in a minute hahaWhat do you mean on bed? And maybe it's because it was my first one of these games, but I played it as "I can hint about my role subtly uness I'm on trial and then go balls out." So I did hint pretty hard.
That would be my response, too.Tubby: "Okay if we both think Kelly is mafia, let's put him on trial."
Simple as that.
![]()
I'm selfishly so happy that people are saying this.
Trying to explain what is obvious to you to others is a massive challenge - even for the most experienced players.
Even when I feel like I'm blatantly trying to help I'm in an everlasting state of sus.
Honestly, I was excited to see the foreman role... then I read it and I said "well this is a useless pile of ca ca."Not everyone who is innocent will hint at a role. Imo it's not helpful to the town to hint at a role you can't prove or use to be helpful. It made sense to do what you did with your role, but I get why Jon never strongly hinted.
And then I was conned before ever getting to post and with that role and having nothing to deflect I felt I was screwed. Honestly surprised I lasted as long as I did.Honestly, I was excited to see the foreman role... then I read it and I said "well this is a useless pile of ca ca."
Yeah, Foreman is not a particularly powerful role by any means.Honestly, I was excited to see the foreman role... then I read it and I said "well this is a useless pile of ca ca."
But since I know I can hint harder moving forward, I will. But since this was my first game and I pestered poor @VashTheStampede so much for rules clarifications, I just assumed some things.
It took a surprisingly long time for anyone to even notice your tell!And then I was conned before ever getting to post and with that role and having nothing to deflect I felt I was screwed. Honestly surprised I lasted as long as I did.
Yeah, Foreman is not a particularly powerful role by any means.
I am of the opinion that having just "blank" citizen roles is bad for engagement, so I did purposely make some weaker roles to go along with the powerful ones that might be at least situationally useful.
It took a surprisingly long time for anyone to even notice your tell!
Fuckin psychos, manSo uh..
I guess Zell's move backfired eh?
Zell did the math for themOmg The City might prevail
They're fun to watch but it never works out.Fuckin psychos, man
NEVER DO THE MATHZell did the math for them
Voice to text for everything would be my solutionHonestly I would've given up on your tell within five posts. I'm on a phone and it automatically adds punctuation. It'd be a nightmare to remove it all and I'd surely miss some
Man, Matt screwed Kelly again!NEVER DO THE MATH
Well I mean Tubby did blow up two of his teammates.So if Kelly is on trial, then the Mafia loses, because surely the bomber will take out the other one during the day, right? And if Zell kills Tubby to prevent that, then he can't kill all the citizens before he's killed. So basically it's up to Zell who wins.
Who do you think he'll give it to?
I was on my PC for 80%. Tonight I was on my phone for the other 20% and it was fucking torture.Honestly I would've given up on your tell within five posts. I'm on a phone and it automatically adds punctuation. It'd be a nightmare to remove it all and I'd surely miss some