Is sex with angels considered monsterfucking?

[Smacktard]

Discuss.

 

[Nae'blis]

I think it depends if you mean the humanoid angels or the biblically accurate angels..

Although, even the latter are generally considered to be good-natured, though monstrous in form.

On the other hand, humans can be pretty damn monstrous.

In conclusion, it wholly depends on you go by monstrosity in looks or in behaviour.

So my answer is:

 

[Smacktard]

I would argue that "monstrosity" is defined by the essence of the creature. Sirens and Medusae are arguably sexy, but they're still monsters. What makes them monstrous? Is it their danger, characteristics, and behavior? I don't think so. I think they're monsters because they're mythical and non-human. I think of angels similarly. It's not their appearance or actions, but some innate monstrousness about them that's a bit hard to define.

 

[Alucard15 Was Here]

According to Dogma they have no genitals, so at the very least I'd describe it as creative fucking.

 

[Smacktard]

According to Dogma they have no genitals, so at the very least I'd describe it as creative fucking.

 

[Jon]

Discuss.

Is it consensual?

 

[Smacktard]

Is it consensual?

Yes

 

[canadaguy]

Is monsterfucking a part of the vernacular that I wasn't aware existed?

God dang some of y'alls is freaks

 

[Jon]

Yes

Then no. It's immaculate at that point.

 

[canadaguy]

What if man is the true monster?

 

[Smacktard]

What if man is the true monster?

Would it be considered bestiality for the angels fucking men?

 

[Jon]

Would it be considered bestiality for the angels fucking men?

Angels are technically non bi-nary and genderless.

 

[Mark]

I think it depends if you mean the humanoid angels or the biblically accurate angels..

Although, even the latter are generally considered to be good-natured, though monstrous in form.

On the other hand, humans can be pretty damn monstrous.

In conclusion, it wholly depends on you go by monstrosity in looks or in behaviour.

So my answer is:

Biblically accurate angel sex would be like goatse.

Y'all are welcome.

I hold myself in contempt.

I'm also content holding myself.

Weiner joke.

 

[Smacktard]

Angels are technically non bi-nary and genderless.

That's not what bestiality means though

 

[Jon]

That's not what bestiality means though

Beastiality is human having intercourse with animals. Angels are not animals. They are genderless, non-binary humanoids.

 

[Smacktard]

Beastiality is human having intercourse with animals. Angels are not animals. They are genderless, non-binary humanoids.

Would they view us as beasts, though, even if the standard definition of bestiality doesn't apply?

 

[Jon]

Would they view us as beasts, though, even if the standard definition of bestiality doesn't apply?

I mean... they would have to think of "God" as a beast then too, since humans are theoretically created in God's image.

So I'd lean to no.

I haven't had hypothetical debate like this since friggin mock trial. I don't know if I'm happy or suffering PTSD.

 

[Smacktard]

I mean... they would have to think of "God" as a beast then too, since humans are theoretically created in God's image.

So I'd lean to no.

I haven't had hypothetical debate like this since friggin mock trial. I don't know if I'm happy or suffering PTSD.

Frankenstein's monster was made in man's image, and fucking Frankenstein would definitely be monsterfucking.

 

[canadaguy]

Counterpoint, angels don't exist

 

[Fool's Requiem]

 

[Jon]

Frankenstein's monster was made in man's image, and fucking Frankenstein would definitely be monsterfucking.

I mean... he was human parts... so I'm not sure the validity of this statement. Sounds like this may need its own adjudication!

 

[The Flame]

I guess?

From what I've seen, it doesn't take much for an anime character to be considered a "monster girl". I've seen ones that were supposed to be onis or devils of some sort, and they were just humans with a horn or pair of horns, so I imagine big wings is good enough. That's just one pair of bird legs away from being a harpy. Biblically accurate version would not even be a debate, though.

 

[Kat]

I mean... he was human parts... so I'm not sure the validity of this statement. Sounds like this may need its own adjudication!

But he's literally Frankenstein's monster.

I would classify angels as monsters, sure. Monsters aren't necessarily evil. I don't see why they wouldn't qualify.

 

[Alucard15 Was Here]

Technically speaking people can be monsters as well.

 

[Nae'blis]

I mean... he was human parts... so I'm not sure the validity of this statement. Sounds like this may need its own adjudication!

Now this begs the question, did Frankenstein give the monster the necessary bits for sex?

 

[Nae'blis]

God dang some of y'alls is freaks

And you're realizing this just now?

 

[canadaguy]

Now this begs the question, did Frankenstein give the monster the necessary bits for sex?

I mean he has a bride

 

[The Flame]

Isn't the monster just stitched together parts of humans or something? I would assume it still has the equipment. Though I guess I don't know the story of Frankenstein that well, so maybe that's wrong.

 

[Jon]

Frankenstein's monster, unlike Trump, had the "pleasure of visiting" Epstein's Island. We shouldn't speak of it.

 

[Benzine]

I'm more of a visual learner, could you show me some examples?

 

[Jon]

I'm more of a visual learner, could you show me some examples?

 

[Nae'blis]

 

[shortkut]

 

[Quagmire]

I would argue that "monstrosity" is defined by the essence of the creature. Sirens and Medusae are arguably sexy, but they're still monsters. What makes them monstrous? Is it their danger, characteristics, and behavior? I don't think so. I think they're monsters because they're mythical and non-human. I think of angels similarly. It's not their appearance or actions, but some innate monstrousness about them that's a bit hard to define.

If using this definition then yes. I'd bang the fuck out of a siren or Medusa (if I'm blind folded)

 

[Quagmire]

Counterpoint, angels don't exist

Neither do other monster and mythical creatures

 

[Quagmire]

According to Dogma they have no genitals, so at the very least I'd describe it as creative fucking.

They have creases and a mouth

 

[canadaguy]

Neither do other monster and mythical creatures

Monsters certainly do

 

[Ben]

These Angels, right?

 

[shortkut]

These Angels, right?

Where are their wings?